This just in: social networks are the taking off! Welcome to 2006, folks.
The article on Business Week is actually a pretty good read, and centers on how we should be using social networks, and goes well beyond just telling us that they're out there. Trust me -- It's not nearly as dated as the headline featured in the AAAA SmartBrief.
A lot of people are talking about Coleman's new TV spots because they think that it's clever to poke fun at that newfangled social networking stuff the kids like to do and that thar computin' machine. I'm talking about them because they've summed up exactly what online social networking should be to marketers -- a place where people who use and/or appreciate your brand can sit down, shoot the shit and just generally have a pleasant time. And also get drunk and skinny dip in the lake. Hey -- the client may not like it, but sometimes it's just the only way.
Oh, and for the record, Coleman isn't just good at social networking the original way. Check out their facebook page here.
Tug and John release a few months of advertising frustration and end up on several high horses.
0:00 Google the Herculoids 8:08 We Still Like Hulu 8:52 Adventures in Fast Food (Would You Like Controversy With That?) 16:59 "Well, Can't We Just..." 18:40 Bad Copy That Caught Our Eye 20:34 Read Topic Suggestion Sets Us Off 32:38 Mother's Day Advertising 35:38 Bonus Track 36:35 Too Much Beer Track (From a Lost Episode)
I love it when an incredibly timely and entertaining message is unleashed upon humanity. Relevant advertising that captures the moment is infinitely more
engaging than random messaging with the same placement. Check out the other spot.
NOTE: Before you read the following post, please watch the above video,
which you've likely seen already, but hey -- one more time couldn't
hurt, right?
Watch it? Good. Let's begin:
Yesterday at breakfast, my mom the accountant
started in on one of her "I saw the funniest commercial yesterday"
stories that she uses to give me unsolicited (the best kind) advice on
how I should be doing my job. I typically enjoy these conversations,
mostly because they make me feel smarter than her, but also because she
unintentionally give me little bits of insight that I like to stash
away in the recesses of my brain for use at a later time -- like, say,
in blog posts.
Anyway, our latest conversation was particularly intriguing. Here's how it went:
MOM: "I saw the funniest commercial yesterday."
ME: [In my "I'm utterly-disinterested-in-what-you're-about-to-say-but-I'll-listen-'cause-you're-my-mom" tone] "Really? What was it?"
MOM: This new Apple ad [Much like seemingly all ad people, my mom loves Apple ads] about programs.
ME: Programs?
MOM: Yeah -- you know, "we've got a program for that."
ME: App.
MOM: ?
ME: We've got an APP for that. What do you like about it, because it's obviously not the copy...
MOM: They just make the them sound really useful. Hey what time is the Royals game tonight? [My mother's brain can be very erratic]
ME: [Looks
on Sportacular iPhone app] Six o'clock. Well, don't you think apps
probably ARE useful? Just showing off a few examples isn't all that
innovative...
MOM: Well, I thought it was pretty cool. Hey, I think your dad wants to go to that game tonight. I wonder if I can get tickets?
ME: [Checks TicketsDirect app] Yes, you can. I just ordered them. Third base line. Pick 'em up at will-call.
MOM: Oh, good. I was worried it was sold out.
ME: Not
yet. Probably will be later today, though. And about those apps, do you
wanna try any out? I've got my iPhone right here, and there's a recipe
book app I bet you'd adore.
MOM: No. That stuff's for you
kids. I wouldn't know what to do with it. [Looking at the check, which
she refuses to let me pay] Hey, what's 18% of $26.54?
ME [In my head]: I would show you, but calculators are for us kids. You wouldn't know what to do with one.
ME [In reality]: *Sigh* [Opens Tipulator App] $4.78.
That's
right, folks. My mom is fully capable of auditing a multi-national
corporation, but she really believes that the App store is beyond her
realm of comprehension. The best part? Not even a TV commercial THAT
SHE TOLD ME MAKES IT LOOK USEFUL or her son using it to solve everyday
problems right in front of her can change her attitude. I would say
something about old dogs and new tricks, but my mother is a nice
upstanding lady, thank you very much, and would likely take offense to
being compared to an aged canine.
What I will say, though, is
that I wonder if this kind of thinking is exactly why it's often
difficult to sell a client on something new and different. Because even
if they know it will likely be effective at solving a problem and
creative enough to get noticed, they still won't buy off on it because
that stuff's "for you kids" and not whatever brand it is they happen to
be managing. All of this leaves me wondering three things:
1. How do we convince the current generation of decision makers to change that curmudgeonly way of thinking?
2. Will
the next generation of decision makers -- the millenials -- think the
same way, or will their upbringing in the digital era leave them more
open to change and new ideas?
3. How did my mother the accountant not know what 18% of $26.54 was?
If
you've got the answers to these questions, or even just a half-baked
theory or two, please help a brotha out and share with the rest of us.
These days, it seems like everybody's doin' this newfangled thing the kids are calling social media. Whether it's Twitter, Facebook, Youtube or one of the many other networks that exist out there on the intertubez, many clients are looking to establish their presence when it comes to social media so they don't fall behind the tide like they might have by not having a website back in '98.
And while it can be tricky, there are several ways to win when it comes to social media. Zappos.com did it, and mega-brands like Dell, Harley-Davidson,Victoria's Secret and Google, too. But for these five successes, there are several thousand failures.
Why? Well, I'm sure the reasons are plentiful, but from what I've seen as a young, slightly geeky dude who's been involved in this whole social media movement since back in the friendster days, there are a lot of ways to fall flat on your face in the social media universe. Here are the top 3:
1. You've failed to understand your medium.
Social media, you see, isn't like anything else you've ever done. It isn't print or TV or radio or guerilla or alternative media or traditional, one-way web communication. In fact, social media isn't a medium at all. Rather, it's an easy way to describe the collection of hundreds or thousands of different platforms on the web that allow people to connect with eachother. Where many of us go wrong, I think, is when we falsely believe that each or even most of these networks use the same tone of voice and rules of etiquette.
A wise man, in a rather unwise moment, told me that "I don't have to know about Twitter to do Twitter." Luckily, this man has never had to "do Twitter" for a client -- because he certainly wouldn't do it well. Without first immersing himself in the network's world and gaining a rudimentary understanding of all it's unwritten laws*, an advertiser will fail to gain a following at best, and will piss off an unthinkable number of people at worst.
So let's pretend that you like Converse Chuck Taylors -- seeing as you're in advertising, that doesn't seem like too tough of a proposition. Now let's say that you believe your Johnston-and-Murphy-wearing accountant friend's feet would look positively rockin' in the classic low-top black model we've all come to know and love. How do you go about telling him about the shoes you think he'll dig, if only he tries them on? Do you tell him about breathable canvas uppers and reinforced eyelets? Do you make sure to mention that if you act before 10/31/10, you can receive up to $3.57 off after mail-in rebate? Do you do all of this through a megaphone from 3 inches away?
Of course not -- if you talked like that all the time, you wouldn't have any friends to begin with, let alone possess the potential to make new ones. You'd definitely be much more subtle than that. You'd answer any questions he asks about your shoes, and lay off the hard sell. After all, he's your FRIEND, right?
Right.
3. You've failed to be willing to be transparent.
In just about every medium we use, ad dudes and dudettes get to select the information they want users to know. We run the sexy facts and figures and relinquish the ugly stuff to the disclaimer copy. Unfortunately for us, when it comes to social media, there is no disclaimer. Everything (and I mean EVERYTHING) about a brand, whether it be good or bad, is going to get discussed by your friends and followers. Did one of your customers receive positively awful service? Did a product fail to deliver on all of the promises you once wrote? Did your brand's CEO get caught in a seedy hotel room with a mistress -- or in a Swiss bank with an extra "bonus" from the company coffers? Then you can bet you'll hear about it from your online friends or followers.
Now calmly wipe the sweat from your forehead, change your pants if necessary, and listen up: all of these events, and all of these conversations were going to happen anyway. All we're doing by getting involved in social media is giving ourselves a voice in the community in which they take place. And used in the right way, this voice is a weapon we can use All we have to do is meet public outrage with simple, honest answers. If we do that, not only will quell our detractors, but we may even turn them into friends and advocates.
P.S. -- If you don't know about FAIL!ing, then you should probably crawl out from under that rock and visit the FAIL! blog.
Remember back in the good ol' days, when men were men and gamers were mostly virgins? When Mario's party was getting busted up by the cops and not crashed by your mom? Well back in those days, friends, there was a little game called Mike Tyson's, I meanAlleged Rapist's, I mean Ear Chomper's Punch-Out!!
We all played it, and we didn't have any fancy motion-sensing controllers to help us knock Glass Joe or King Hippo the f%&* out. No, back in those days we used good, old-fashioned button mashing to take down our 8-bit foes. Well, friends, Punchout!!! is back, and I'll be the first to say that while the jury is out on gameplay until the 18th, the new TV spot is decidedly awesome.
American Idol may or may not be great television. But there's no denying that it is freakin' brilliant marketing. And tonight's results show is the ultimate example.
A couple bazillion viewers will tune in and will happily sit through a buttload of traditional TV commercials, several "special appearances" by celebrities who all just happen to have something new to sell right now, and several plugs for iTunes. By the end of the show, viewers will have absorbed sixty solid minutes of marketing content, all for a ten-second payoff. (Even if the losing contestant has a name with lots of syllables - like Allison Iraheta - and even if Seacrest talks real, real slow, I'm pretty it wouldn't take more than 10 seconds to say the loser's name.) Absolutely brilliant. Advertisers pay top dollar to run spots that each require more air time than the actual program content. And I'm guessing that the weekly "special guests" are paying Fox for the exposure, not vice-versa. Anybody know?
Simon is making noises about leaving the show after next season. He's saying maybe it's time for a change. What he's talking about, of course, is a change in the number of zeros Fox puts on his paycheck. And he should. American Idol is Fox's gravy train, and Simon's the engineer.